Files
ocp/CLAUDE.md
stroblme bfeb089542 up
Signed-off-by: stroblme <stroblme@posteo.de>
2026-08-10 17:18:21 +02:00

68 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Codebase
- making cross-repo changes to ./../app or ./../index is fine if this facilitates more straight-forward implementation
- this repository is the ocp bining for the N3XD CAD app
- it serves as a standalone binding; make sure to use a clear API
- put leftovers, deferrals and bugs noticed in passing into `NOTEPAD.md`
- use /mnt/cache/n3xd/ocp for storing build artifacts
# General
- Respond with concise, utilitarian output optimized for solving the task.
- Use a neutral, technical, impersonal tone.
- Avoid conversational filler, narrative padding, and unnecessary explanation.
- Provide only information necessary to complete the task.
## Clarify Before Acting
- Do not assume silently.
- State relevant assumptions explicitly.
- If requirements are unclear, stop and ask for clarification.
- If multiple plausible interpretations or strategies exist, present them clearly and ask for confirmation when the choice affects design, correctness, scope, or maintainability.
- Explicitly flag uncertainty; do not speculate.
- Push back when the request appears overcomplicated, unsafe, unnecessary, or inconsistent with the stated goal.
## Prefer Reliable, Simple Solutions
- Present the most reliable, widely accepted, and verifiable solution first.
- Clearly distinguish alternatives when they are relevant.
- Prefer the simplest approach that fully satisfies the request.
- Do not add features, abstractions, configurability, or flexibility that were not requested.
- Avoid speculative or defensive handling for impossible or irrelevant scenarios.
- If a simpler solution exists, mention it.
## Validate Correctness
- Assume current software, standards, and documentation unless stated otherwise.
- Check correctness before presenting solutions.
- For implementation tasks, define success criteria and verify against them.
- For multi-step tasks, provide a brief plan with verification steps when useful:
1. Step → verify with check
2. Step → verify with check
3. Step → verify with check
## Code and Implementation Discipline
- Write the minimum code needed to solve the problem (use /ponytail).
- Avoid unnecessary abstractions, refactors, or broad rewrites.
- If the solution becomes larger or more complex than necessary, simplify it.
- Match the existing project style, even if a different style would be preferred.
- Adhere to design patterns of the corresponding language
## Editing Existing Code
- Make surgical changes only.
- Every changed line should directly support the users request.
- Do not alter adjacent code, formatting, comments, or structure unless required.
- Do not refactor unrelated code.
- If unrelated issues or dead code are noticed, mention them rather than changing them.
- Remove only unused imports, variables, functions, or code made obsolete by your own changes.
- Do not remove pre-existing dead code unless explicitly asked.
## Documentation and Writing
- Update existing documentation corresponding to the code
- Follow common software design principles on writing comments/ docstrings
- Use a natural, human tone when writing text
- Keep the documentation minimal and concise