stroblmeandClaude Opus 5
f8a7dfb101
Docs / docs (push) Successful in 32s
Playwright Tests / test-playwright (1, 2) (push) Successful in 2m58s
Playwright Tests / test-playwright (2, 2) (push) Successful in 2m9s
pre-commit / pre-commit (push) Failing after 2m23s
Test Backend / test-backend (push) Successful in 3m17s
Playwright Tests / merge-reports (push) Canceled after 0s
Compose Smoke Test / test-compose (push) Canceled after 28s
Comparing the per-node digest against an engine that does not record one is comparing against nothing, and reporting every node as changed on every sync for ever — which is what a client newer than its engine did, since `NodeDef` drops fields it has never heard of. A node is named now only when both sides carry a digest, so a no-op sync is `unchanged` again and the signal one syncs for is back. That silence had also been the only sign of the mismatch, so sync now names it: one line saying the engine stored no record of what a node's code reaches, with both versions in it and what to run. Bumped to 0.1.6 — the digest changed the stored document's shape, and a version that does not move makes two different engines indistinguishable, which is the thing it was made load-bearing for a day ago. `— draft` was printed whenever there was simply nothing to publish, which reads as work left unfinished. It is said only when a draft is genuinely there, and `— published` when one was. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01A9Hdrmf2cwNABCnE5x9UJa