stroblmeandClaude Opus 5
68d2565054
Docs / docs (push) Successful in 22s
Playwright Tests / test-playwright (1, 2) (push) Failing after 2m46s
Playwright Tests / test-playwright (2, 2) (push) Successful in 1m49s
pre-commit / pre-commit (push) Failing after 1m57s
Test Backend / test-backend (push) Failing after 2m28s
Compose Smoke Test / test-compose (push) Successful in 35s
Playwright Tests / merge-reports (push) Successful in 1m19s
Three things the first pass left.
`serve` now names the flows asking for a GPU when the engine has none
declared. The placer already warned, but into the log, where a fresh install
that forgot `--gpus` does not read it — and the cost of missing it is GPU
nodes running concurrently, which is what the declaration exists to prevent.
The seed was the one field an export still had to coalesce: `--seed 1`
filled the run-level column and left `param.seed` blank, while a declared
seed filled the parameter and left the column blank. It is resolved like
every other input now, and the column carries the seed the run actually used
however it arrived — including when a parameter outranks the run's own,
where the column used to report the one that lost.
And the docs say plainly that declaring the card is what buys the worker
retirement: a node that imports jax without `resources={"gpus": 1}` never
gets CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES, so nothing marks its worker as one holding a card.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019Hra4ndWMCLU5F3KjUuVAc