A wheel whose top-level module is `app` collides with anything else in a
user's venv, so the package that is about to be published takes the name
it is published under. Only the Python package moves; the repo, the
Docker WORKDIR and the compose project keep theirs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
`make lint-frontend` was `biome check --write --unsafe ./` — a lint target that
reformatted the whole tree rather than checking it, which is why every parallel
change in this repo has had to work around it. `lint` checks now and a new
`format` writes. The pre-commit hook and CI needed no edit at all: both call
`bun run lint`, so they became checks the moment its meaning changed.
`app/Makefile` assigned DOMAIN from .env, and a plain assignment beats an
inherited environment variable and is not exported — so `cd app && make
dev-local` served localhost while the same checkout's tests targeted the
configured domain. `export DOMAIN ?=` gives the lattice that was intended:
command line, then environment, then .env.
Alongside: the backend's htmlcov bind mount created that directory as root, so
`make test-backend` died on the coverage step after every test had passed,
which reads like a test failure and is not one. The alerts screen's copy of
ALERTING_EVENTS is now checked by a test rather than trusted. And the shard
comment claimed two spec files where there are nine.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Uq8mtNb97A7praJLyeEYgs
A dashboard went live the moment it was created — an empty document straight to
the panels — while a new flow starts as a draft. It now works the way flows do:
published means `dashboard.json` exists, so every dashboard on every running
installation is already published and nothing needs migrating. Only the ones
created from here on start as drafts.
Mirroring FlowStore turned up a latent 500: discarding the draft of a dashboard
that had never been published unlinked its only file, and the read that followed
raised out of a 200 handler. It answers 400 now, the way a flow does.
Publishing all of them was 2N requests, because a publish has to name the
version it expects and the summaries did not carry one. They do now — and so do
the flow summaries, which had the same defect nobody had written down.
A panel had no way to hear about any of this. A publish, or a change to which
dashboards a panel carries, now puts one event on the bus and the screen
refetches what changed: no reload, so a wall display never blanks or asks for
its credential again. The subtle half is that a socket's message allowlist was
computed once at handshake — a reassigned panel would have fetched its new
document and then shown tiles that never updated.
The panels dialog logged non-superusers out. Every write in it needs a
superuser, not only the checkboxes the report mentioned, so the dialog is
read-only for everyone else. The logout itself was `main.tsx` treating 403 as a
dead session, against the contract deps.py spells out: only a 401 ends a
session, and a 403 now says so rather than silently signing someone out.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Uq8mtNb97A7praJLyeEYgs
Four controls and the unit's own answer beside them. Two catches, both on:
the flow is seeded stopped and the node's commands setting is off. The initial
values are read off the unit when the script runs, so starting the flow asks
for what it was already doing rather than commanding it to something else.
Two things stopped the engine commanding this house. ConnectorNode hardwired
its node function to a no-op, so an input message reaching a connector was
discarded and Art-Net's packet builder was unreachable; write() now carries
the input ports, which is additive so the contract version holds. And the MQTT
publisher JSON-encoded every payload, so "ON" went on the wire quoted and the
devices on a shared broker, which speak bare values, ignored it.
seed_house_control.py is the rig: a flow that drives the washing machine plug,
a dimmer and a colour fixture over MQTT, carries the same two as DMX on an
Art-Net node with transmit still off, and a dashboard to drive it by hand.
A python node's settings are constants of its own function, so they are passed
the way its ports are: by name. The controller binds them to the compiled
function, the `params` field is gone from the worker and remote protocols, and
a setting sharing a port's name is reported as a node error rather than
shadowing it. The panel's scaffold follows suit and keeps the header in step
with both ports and settings.
The demo's `pace` moves from a flow input to a setting of the training node,
which is what it always was.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NUb8YpL2s3gmN9WTACTt4q
`scripts/seed_demo.py` wipes and recreates one persistent demo — `home`,
`home_history` and `pv_model`, plus a `demo` dashboard carrying all fifteen
widget types across three sections. Operational script for the hosted
instance only: `make seed-hosted-demo`, with `API_URL` selecting which one.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HTsT1isxUjw5gtkJk8WhuA
make seed-demo builds demo_training — prepare on the engine, a GPU-bound
train, evaluate back here — and a panel that draws the loss curve while the
training is still going. It is the session's whole argument in one flow: batch
runs with parameters and a result, a generator yielding on a declared port
rather than logging, fluksio.emit from inside a callback, artifacts carrying
the dataset and the weights between machines, and a sweep whose configs are
isolated from each other. The train node prefers its label rather than
requiring it, so it runs before a GPU box exists and says which machine and
which numeric backend it actually used.
Building it turned up two real bugs. A run waited for a worker its flow only
*preferred*, because required_labels ignored device_policy — so the example
hung on a label it did not need. And a run's seed never reached the flow, so
sweeping over seeds ran the same experiment N times; it now fills an input of
that name when the flow declares one, which is what the field looked like it
did all along.
Pressing Run on a batch flow now submits a run rather than taking the old
non-durable path — that button is the first thing anyone evaluating will press,
and it was quietly doing something else.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01AD8SfVhzXBG2nAfFcVh3iD
A chart is drawn in buckets, and nothing it can show changes until the
bucket it is drawing closes — so the resolution sets the refresh rather
than a flat five-second floor. A week at quarter-hour buckets now asks
four times an hour instead of sixty, for the same picture. Leaving the
field empty follows the window; a slower rate is still honoured.
`make seed-example` builds the thing to evaluate it with: a flow that
logs a temperature to InfluxDB, a flow that answers a chart's request by
turning the window into Flux and the rows back into a series, and a
dashboard holding the chart. The reading flow declares the request as an
input with a starting value, which is how a flow says a value reaches it
from a panel rather than from a node upstream.
Axis labels keep enough decimals to stay distinct — `si` rounds to three
figures, so every tick of a chart living inside one degree read "19".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
stroblmeandClaude Opus 5