The engine answered "where does this node run" twice, in two ways that could
not see each other: a device sent it to a worker carrying that label, and
resources were counted against the engine's own cores. Declaring both meant the
second answer won and nothing was counted at all — which the data-science
getting-started page and the worked example both do.
One question now, in flow/placement.py: of every machine attached, which could
grant what this node asked for, and which of those has it free. The books move
onto each machine — one accountant per worker, built from the inventory it
reported — and the waiting moves above them, where one condition variable can
be woken by a release anywhere or by a worker attaching. Locks go one way:
placer, then a machine's books, never back.
So a node asking for a card now finds the box that has one, rather than being
clamped down to none and run here. When nothing can grant the ask at all it is
still cut down and run — a flow written on a cluster has to work on a laptop —
but the ceiling is one real machine now, since taking the largest of each
dimension separately can describe a machine nobody has.
Two things fixed on the way. A device on a connector node held every batch run
of its flow forever, waiting for a worker that could never run an entry point.
And `prefer` falling back to the engine skipped the books, so the fallback held
nothing.
The bench flow's node has taken a `params` argument that with_settings has not
forwarded for some time, so the benchmark could not run at all: 62 ms median
submit-to-result with this, against the 61 ms on record.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01A6HeySA27EkGANZN95QySW
A worker reported its labels and nothing about the machine behind them, so the
engine could route a node to a GPU box but not tell whether that box had a GPU
free. Inventory — cores, GPUs, memory — now arrives with the hello frame, and
the run frame carries back what the engine allocated for that call.
Which is protocol 2 on both ends. GPUs are never probed: asking a vendor tool
would make the one dependency two, so a GPU is what the batch job says it was
given or what --gpus says. A worker that reports nothing still attaches and is
scheduled by its label alone.
Two things a job scheduler needs: --max-idle stops a worker started for one job
rather than letting it hold its allocation to the walltime, and a refusal is now
fatal instead of a reconnect loop that reads as a hang in a job's log.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01A6HeySA27EkGANZN95QySW
Four things the python SDK turned up, each fixed where every client sees it.
A key no port declares is now an error rather than a silent drop, on the
return, the yield and the emit alike — the contract the docs already stated.
The SDK reads literal yields at sync time, so a typo fails before anything
runs, and an emission of one fails the call rather than being logged where
nobody looks.
NaN and infinity are refused at the port. JSON cannot spell either, so one
that travelled came back as a 500, a socket frame that stopped the canvas, or
a metric batch the database dropped whole.
An artifact input takes `@run:<id>.<output>` or a bare digest, resolved on the
engine — so the CLI, the run dialog and a python caller mean the same thing,
and a sweep can pass one at all.
Node timeouts are off by default. The clock measured silence, which a training
node is full of, and remote workers had already stopped enforcing it — their
heartbeat reset it. Now a heartbeat proves the agent rather than the node,
ninety seconds of nothing fails the call either way, and the engine touches
work it is still running so a long node is not redelivered at sixty seconds.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019V5bsYGNxcgPs4xXmTPx69
A wheel whose top-level module is `app` collides with anything else in a
user's venv, so the package that is about to be published takes the name
it is published under. Only the Python package moves; the repo, the
Docker WORKDIR and the compose project keep theirs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
stroblmeandClaude Opus 5